Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both

#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both update
#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both full
#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both software
#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both code

Our Discogs server will be updated monthly from the latest data provided by Discogs.

#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both code

We can also move some processing out of the SongKong itself on the server simplifying SongKong code development and reducing CPU usage, giving additional speedups. The great thing about this is we can customize the search to work exactly how we require it for SongKong rather than working within the constraints of the Discogs provided search, this means we can get better search results and dramatically reduce the number of requests required, so you get better matches faster. There are a host of improvements in this release but the most significant is that Discogs requests are now served by our own server rather than Discogs itself. Pleased to say that SongKong 2.0 is now available. This major release contains a number of significant improvements, a trial can be downloaded from

#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both full

The free trial can be used as many songs as you like for as long as you like and it will create a report showing exactly what has been matched and what could be modified but it doesn't actually save the changes unless you have a full license. SongKong is created by one person, we have open discussion forums, and an an open bug tracker as well as email support, see here SongKong can be used to monitor a folder and automatically fix new music as it is added to this folder. SongKong can be used on folders, files, playlists or your whole collection SongKong includes fixing metadata, fixing artwork and deleting duplicates within a single application with one lifetime license. SongKong keep all changes in a database so you can revert any changes you don't like at a later date. SongKong creates very detailed reports showing exactly what is had modified, example here SongKong uses MusicBrainz and Discogs instead of Gracenote database SongKong does not run within iTunes, however it can still keep your iTunes database in sync. If you have ever used Tuneup Media or Rinse My Music you could consider SongKong as an alternative. SongKong is a music organization and tagger application designed to simplify the task of managing your digital music collection.

#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both software

But for the single row case, you may consider the first case since the syntax is more common.Hi, I'm the software developer behind an automated music tagger available for Macs. I think merge is better when you do have some processing to be done that means taking data from some tables and updating a table, possibly inserting or deleting rows.

#Songkong matched to musicbrains not matched to release both update

I don't know the inner workings of the merge command but since the command is a single unit, Oracle could execute the correct insert or update with a single index lookup. But the insert is an independent command and it has to do a second lookup. Oracle opens an implicit cursor, and we use it to wrap a corresponding insert so we know that the insert will only happen when the key does not exist. It has to, in order to update the right row. In the first example the update does an index lookup. WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET val1 = in_val1, val2 = in_val2

The code below is the possibly new and improved code MERGE INTO tablename USING dual ON ( val3 = in_val3 ) UPDATE tablename SET val1 = in_val1, val2 = in_val2 I've been using the first code sample for years. ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this transaction exceptions instead. In transaction mode SERIALIZABLE, which I don't recommend btw, you might run into WHEN DUP_VAL_ON_INDEX THEN - an entry was concurrently inserted WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN - the entry was concurrently deleted WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT ('id','last','name') WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET 'last'='smith', 'name'='john' MERGE INTO Employee USING dual ON ( 'id'=2097153 ) To fix that, the insert/update combo must be wrapped in some kind of loop statement, so that in case of an exception the whole thing is retried.ДЄs an example, here's how Grommit's code can be wrapped in a loop to make it safe when run concurrently: PROCEDURE MyProc ( None of the answers given so far is safe in the face of concurrent accesses, as pointed out in Tim Sylvester's comment, and will raise exceptions in case of races.